One of the things we try to do is create essays that have some lifetime with the Google Search engines. We're quite successful at doing what we do, to the point that half of our site traffic is search engine traffic. For those of you who are math challenged, that means that of the six hits we get every day, half come from Google or elsewhere. (When people get mad at something we write, we get these cute little quips as to how few people read this blog, so we try to play into their perceptions.)
We've written in the past about what we try to do in the hopes that other conservative blogs would follow our example. None have and so we have quit trying to teach. We only "do" now.
One of the things that we do, and did yesterday, is to put a provocative title on the essay. Search engine users like short, snappy titles. Long titles are truncated to the point that search engine users never see them.
Maybe the title was a bit too provocative. Folks who actually read the essay would have discovered that it was 1) a plea for a road map to fix Roe, 2) a strong suggestion that the roadmap be secular and include legal ethics reform as a major underpinning, and 3) a comment that until the legal system was once again ethical, Pro Lifers might as well learn to live with Roe - hence the title.
We have some pretty sophisticated readers who did understand what we were doing.
And then we had a Neanderthal. We at this blog are blessed with a homosexual Religious Right Neanderthal "reader" with a short attention span, almost no reading comprehension, and an IQ of perhaps 87. Most of this guy's (identified by IP) many unpublished (and unpublishable) comments begin with a homosexual proposition. We're guessing that the guy is looking for funding for his church and political allies from Tim Gill or Mr. Amendment 41, Jared Polis, but we could be wrong.
Since our resident Neanderthal was uncharacteristically civil yesterday, we are taking the time to quote him:
I'm sorry you get sexually aroused at the thought of innocent babies being slaughtered you twisted son of a bitch. It's sickening that you think murder should be legal. You probably beat off to pictures of Dahmer and Gein.
As we said, this is uncharacteristically civil for this writer. We chuckled for a good ten minutes. How can you not call a guy like this a homosexual religious right Neanderthal with a short attention span, almost no reading comprehension, and an IQ of 87? Heck, we probably could have included "knuckle dragger" and not felt bad.
He didn't even read the essay carefully enough to see that we were not only not promoting Roe, we were trying to encourage a secular fix. If a religious fix were going to work, it would have worked 15 years ago.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result, or so said Albert Einstein.