When Liberals Use Big Words...

When liberals use big words, I turn to my dictionary.

That happened this week when I returned from vacation and found a long comment from a liberal radio personality appended to the most popular post I have ever written.  The comment was intended to be disruptive, and I don't approve disruptive comments on this blog.

On the other hand, this one is also fun.  I had commented that I tried to be careful about what I write:

" I take a good deal of pride in what I write. You won't find anything on this blog that I don't consider accurate."  - YOU

Well, a dog takes pride his shit-pile.  At any rate, you aren't the worst writer in the world, but you have a lot of work to do, before you should take pride in the non-sequitur laden tripe you write.  Most of it is pretty cryptic and maybe the <100 IQ crowd gets it by dint of some special code you guys share, but the rest of us need things to, a priori, make sense.

And you may believe with zero ambivalence that what you write is indeed "accurate" but that isn't really the point.  You still may be objectively wrong regardless of what you 'believe' to be right.  Have you ever even heard of logical fallacies?  I ask, because you commit them every other sentence and  this is the sine qua non of the person who is blissfully unaware of the phenomenon itself. 

I'm sure George W. thinks he's accurate all the time too.  But he's wrong a lot, despite his "belief" that he's right.  Duh.

Take care,

Diablo

I've owned more than one dog and I've not noticed that behavior.  Have you consdered that it may be that dogs that are owned by liberals are never quite sure what they are being fed and are more curious about what has come out?

Since you read this blog often, I assume that you can cite multiple examples of non-sequiturs and the "logical fallacies" that I commit "every other sentence."  Be specific and try not to use 25 cent words when nickle words will do-to accomodate my 100 IQ audience.

I'll be happy to publish what you send although I may edit it to get rid of unwanted google hooks and the big words.

Comments

[M. Douglas Wray]

You don't approve of them but you certainly do make hay of them. Bra-vo. (claps discretely) :-D (doing my very very best not to be silly)

[a watcher]

I think this was a drive by attack without substance. He wanted to discredit a blog entry he didn't agree with. He hadn't made a comment earlier (I checked his ISP) and wasn't willing to put his name to what he wrote.

I look on having a blog as an opportunity to have fun. While it is bad form to taunt people who comment, I will happily taunt those whose comments seem insincere.

On the other hand, if this guy really can point out bad writing, I'll take it seriously. I'm not perfect.