As usual, when we get good comments, we do bring them forward because so few people are curious enough to click the comments to see what was said.
Mr. [ a ] Watcher
Let me state up front that I believe that the Congressional incandescent light ban is foolish and anti-free market. In many ways, the entire "green" movement is based on feelings-this is "green", therefore it is good. I am an engineer, and emotionally-based arguments do not have the impact on me that they did when I was younger. However, I believe that Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFL's) get an undeservedly bad rap.
I've used CFL's for more than three years. When I lived in Ohio, I used them in the stairwell in my apartment. While it took a few seconds for the light to attain full luminescence, I was surprised in the increase in light output compared to the typical 60-watt incandescent. Thence, upon my relocation to Northglenn, I've replaced nearly all of my lights with the CFL's, even in my outdoor storage area. Surprisingly, they have performed admirably. They cost slightly more than $2 per bulb when purchasing multi-packs from Wal*Mart or Sam's Club.
I do have a few caveats for the use of CFL's. First, though I have yet to replace a CFL, they have worked for over 20 months straight. Second, the CFL version of the outdoor bug light (yellow-bulb) does not work well and should be avoided. These cost three times a normal CFL, and the light is too white to effectively deter mosquitoes and moths. Finally, they do not work with dimmers properly. They do work in a three-way bulb socket, but you do not get the brightness variation
I believe that one reason people are hesitant to install CFL's is that their proponents typically overplay their hands. My visceral reaction to hearing the latest "green" proposal is to cringe and prepare for more government regulation and interference.
The most amusing thing about the CFL controversy is that emerging technology may render CFL's obsolete before the incandescent light bulb ban goes into effect. Light-emitting Diodes (LED) light bulbs are beginning to arrive on the market. Supposedly, they will last 100,000 hours (over 11 years continuously on), and the quality of light is better than CFL's. Pretty soon, manufacturing costs will go down, and I'll begin to see them competitively priced at Wal*Mart.
Oddly enough, while I was writing this response to your article, Instapundit.com linked to an article from Forbes on this very subject. The link is here.
Thank you for your time. As always, keep up the good work!
David Carpenter, P.E.
Northglenn, CO
Thanks, David, for your comment. Adding to it, perhaps we should have said that we once owned a retail store and the building it was in. The building was 100 years old and had been remodled with new lighting, but the previous owner didn't stay open at night. The service he put in was all fancy incandescent bulb fixtures with 100 watt bulbs. The place was like a cave at night.
We replaced many of the fancy fixtures with florescent lights and replaced the bulbs in the remaining fixtures with CFL's in order not to change the electrical load. We easily doubled the light in the store, and probably tripled it. If a customer can't see what he wants to buy, he won't buy it, which is why successful stores are well lit.
CFL's at the time cost $17 each, but they did last for years. This author sold out in 2002, and seldom visits the place, but we suspect that there are still compact bulbs in that store that have been there ten years.
Does the current owner, who is an environmentally friendly sort, know that the bulbs have mercury in them? We'd bet not. Would that discourage him from using them? We'd bet not. Still, that environment is different than a home with small children who will be crawling around on the floor, a home that must one day be sold.
The purpose of the post was to be informative. Thanks again, David, for adding to our pool of knowledge, and for the nice complements.