This post is designed to provide backup information to the post on Schaffer v Udall "Digging Two Graves." The left has an unhappy habit of making their mistakes disappear, and the mistake Mark Udall made this week is a whopper.
In the way of background: 1) Last spring, the Democrat Congress required the President to present reports on Iraq in the hope that they wouldn't show progress. 2) When it became obvious that the reports would show progress, Democrats in Congress invited their surrogates to attack the report and the general. 3) The attack took the form of the MoveOn.org "betray us" ad, which was so over the top that it couldn't be defended. 4) The Republicans maneuvered for a vote in both houses condemning the ad. 5) It should have been hard to avoid voting to condemn the ad, but not for the major Democrat Presidential candidates in the Senate who depend on MoveOn.org for money. 6) Mark Udall voted to condemn the ad, earning him anger on his left wing. 7) This week, Rush Limbaugh used the term "phony soldiers," and Udall doubtlessly thinks that turnabout is fair play.
8) On Friday, Mark Udall is reported by several left wing blogs to have sent the following Dear Colleague letter:
September 28, 2007
JOIN AS AN ORIGINAL COSPONSOR OF A RESOLUTION HONORING OUR ARMED FORCES AND CONDEMNING RUSH LIMBAUGH'S ATTACK ON "PHONY SOLDIERS"
Dear Colleague:
On September 26, 2007 the broadcaster Rush Limbaugh told a nationwide radio audience that members of the Armed Forces who have expressed disagreement with current policies of the United States regarding military activities in Iraq are "phony soldiers."
On Monday I will introduce a resolution honoring all Americans serving in the Armed Forces and condemning this unwarranted attack on the integrity and professionalism of those in the Armed Forces who choose to exercise their constitutional right to express their opinions regarding U.S. military action in Iraq.
For more information or to cosponsor the resolution, please contact XXXXXXX in my office at xxxxx.
Sincerely,
Mark Udall
9. The text of Udall's Resolution:
110TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. CON. RES.
Honoring all Americans serving in the Armed Forces of the United States and condemning the attack by broadcaster Rush Limbaugh on the integrity and professionalism of some of those Americans.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. UDALL of Colorado submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Honoring all Americans serving in the Armed Forces of the United States and condemning the attack by broadcaster Rush Limbaugh on the integrity and professionalism of some of those Americans.
Whereas on September 26, 2007, the broadcaster Rush Limbaugh told a nationwide radio audience that members of the Armed Forces who have expressed disagreement with current policies of the United States regarding military activities in Iraq are ''phony soldiers''; and
Whereas such a description constitutes an unwarranted slur on the integrity and professionalism of members of the Armed Forces who exercise their constitutional right to express their opinions regarding public policy in a manner consistent with good order and
discipline: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
SECTION 1. Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Americans serving in the United States Armed Forces have volunteered for such service and have not been drafted for that purpose.
(2) Those who serve in the Armed Forces deserve the respect of all Americans for their willingness to undertake that service.
(3) Those who serve in the Armed Forces do not relinquish their constitutional right to express their opinions regarding public policy in a manner consistent with good order and discipline.
(4) The dedication and honor of Americans serving in the Armed Forces should not be impugned because of their exercise of such right.
SEC. 2. Congress --
(1) recognizes the service of all members of the Armed Forces serving in good standing and with honor to defend the United States, and the personal sacrifices made by them and their families;
(2) commits to judge the merits of the opinions of members of the Armed Forces regarding the policies of the United States, including those related to military actions in Iraq, without prejudice or personal bias, including refraining from unwarranted personal attacks;
(3) condemns in the strongest possible terms the personal attacks made by the broadcaster Rush Limbaugh impugning the integrity and professionalism of Americans serving in the Armed Forces who have expressed opinions regarding military actions in Iraq;
(4) honors all members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel serving in harm's way, as well as their families; and
(5) pledges to debate any supplemental funding request or any policy decisions regarding the war in Iraq with the solemn respect and the commitment to integrity that the sacrifices of these members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel deserve
The problem, as we pointed out at Schaffer v Udall is that this resolution invites the military to politicize itself. A military that feels free to address itself on public policy matters verbally will eventually feel free to do more than speak.
There are 220 years of military tradition fostered by laws and military regulations that specifically prohibit active duty military members from freelance comments about policy or personalities.
Recall that in the early 1990's an Air Force Major General publicly called into question Bill Clinton's fitness to serve as President because of his history as a draft dodger. That made the national news and the man was immediately put out of uniform.
Recall that General of the Army and Medal of Honor winner Douglas MacArthur was relieved from command in Korea and sent into retirement when he publicly questioned President Truman.
General George Patton's tragic automobile accident at the end of WWII prevented him from publicly advocating an attack on Russia. He planned to resign so that he could speak out.
We wrote about the Newburgh plot in Schaffer v Udall. One of George Washington's modern biographers described his "I have grown old and blind in the service of my country" speech to his officers as the most important of his many services to his country.
Congress has the constitutional authority to make separate laws and regulations for the military, and has done so. Military members do not have an unrestricted right of free speech, and no right at all to speak out against the policy set by the military's civilian masters without first leaving the service. Most are quite happy with that policy because they realize that it protects them and their own freedom from a military that might otherwise get out of control.
Now comes that fool, Mark Udall. He would change the 220 years of policy that has made us safe from a politicized military in order to score a political point. Nothing more. No Republican will vote for Udall's resolution, and few Democrats who want to be taken seriously on military matters will.
Mark Udall goes a long way toward helping the Democrats demonstrate their unfitness to be a majority in Congress or hold the Presidency. He shows his own unfitness to be a US Senator. His resolution illustrates the cynicism behind the "we love the soldiers but hate the war" strategy. Just more empty words from empty suits.